anthropic
Version 0.0.0
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.7K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 0.0.0
Version 6.25.0
The official TypeScript library for the OpenAI API
Choosing between Anthropic and Openai? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Openai leads with 13.1M weekly downloads — roughly 2305.2x more. Anthropic has 5.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Anthropic has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Openai comes in at 27.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Openai has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Anthropic has an overall health score of 75/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Anthropic if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Openai if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Anthropic and Openai are solid choices for JavaScript development. Openai has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.