54
FairTypescript wrapper for the Hugging Face Inference API
- Weekly Downloads
- 944
↑215%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 49.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
30
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Huggingface vs Openai
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Openai
30.7 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Openai
22.6M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Openai
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Huggingface
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Openai
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentThe official TypeScript library for the OpenAI API
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.6M
↑14%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 30.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Huggingface and Openai? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Openai leads with 22.6M weekly downloads — roughly 23962.6x more. Huggingface has 944 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Openai has the smallest gzipped bundle at 30.7 KB. Huggingface comes in at 49.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Openai has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Huggingface has an overall health score of 54/100 (moderate), with strong quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Huggingface if you value strong security track record. Choose Openai if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Huggingface and Openai are solid choices for JavaScript development. Openai has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is huggingface better than openai?
- It depends on your needs. Huggingface has a health score of 54/100 while Openai scores 85/100. Openai has more weekly downloads (22.6M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, huggingface or openai?
- Openai has the smaller gzipped bundle at 30.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use huggingface vs openai?
- Based on npm download statistics, Huggingface has approximately 944 weekly downloads and Openai has approximately 22.6M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, huggingface or openai?
- Openai currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Huggingface has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Openai scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.