Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Astro vs Hugo

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Hugo

318.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Astro

7.9M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Astro

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Astro

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Astro

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

  1. astro

    Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.

    7.9M weekly downloads · 899.5 KB gzip · Health 85/100

    0
  2. hugo

    Yet another node.js interface for philips hue

    570 weekly downloads · 318.0 B gzip · Health 47/100

    0

Choosing between Astro and Hugo? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Astro leads with 7.9M weekly downloads — roughly 13913.6x more. Hugo has 570 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Hugo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. Astro comes in at 899.5 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Astro has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Hugo has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Astro if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Hugo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Astro and Hugo are solid choices for JavaScript development. Astro has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is astro better than hugo?
It depends on your needs. Astro has a health score of 85/100 while Hugo scores 47/100. Astro has more recorded weekly downloads (7.9M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, astro or hugo?
Hugo has the smaller gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use astro vs hugo?
Astro has more recorded weekly downloads (7.9M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, astro or hugo?
Astro has a maintenance score of 100/100. Astro scores 100/100 and Hugo scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.