clerk
Version 0.8.3
CouchDB library for Node and the browser
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.1K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 0.8.3
CouchDB library for Node and the browser
Version 4.24.13
Authentication for Next.js
Choosing between Clerk and Next-auth? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Next-auth leads with 3.6M weekly downloads — roughly 3395.9x more. Clerk has 1.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Clerk has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Next-auth comes in at 241.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Next-auth has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Clerk has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Clerk if you value strong security track record. Choose Next-auth if you value large community support, strong security track record.
Both Clerk and Next-auth are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next-auth has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.