43
FairA simple and flexible authentication library
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 4.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Lucia vs Next-auth
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Lucia
4.0 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Next-auth
5.9M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Next-auth
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Lucia
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Next-auth
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
79
GoodAuthentication for Next.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.9M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 81.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Lucia and Next-auth? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Next-auth leads with 5.9M weekly downloads — roughly 5865070.0x more. Lucia has 0 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Lucia has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.0 KB. Next-auth comes in at 81.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Next-auth has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Lucia has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Lucia if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Next-auth if you value large community support, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Lucia and Next-auth are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next-auth has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is lucia better than next-auth?
- It depends on your needs. Lucia has a health score of 43/100 while Next-auth scores 79/100. Next-auth has more weekly downloads (5.9M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, lucia or next-auth?
- Lucia has the smaller gzipped bundle at 4.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use lucia vs next-auth?
- Based on npm download statistics, Lucia has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Next-auth has approximately 5.9M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, lucia or next-auth?
- Next-auth currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Lucia has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Next-auth scores 80/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.