79
GoodCloudinary NPM for node.js integration
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.0M
↓11%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 56.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Cloudinary vs Imagekit
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Imagekit
7.3 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Cloudinary
1.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Cloudinary
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Cloudinary
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Cloudinary
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
65
GoodOffical NodeJS SDK for ImageKit.io integration
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.4K
↓31%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 7.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Cloudinary and Imagekit? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Cloudinary leads with 1.0M weekly downloads — roughly 35.3x more. Imagekit has 28.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Imagekit has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. Cloudinary comes in at 56.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Cloudinary has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Imagekit has an overall health score of 65/100 (good), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Cloudinary if you value large community support, strong security track record. Choose Imagekit if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Cloudinary and Imagekit are solid choices for JavaScript development. Cloudinary has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is cloudinary better than imagekit?
- It depends on your needs. Cloudinary has a health score of 79/100 while Imagekit scores 65/100. Cloudinary has more weekly downloads (1.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, cloudinary or imagekit?
- Imagekit has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use cloudinary vs imagekit?
- Based on npm download statistics, Cloudinary has approximately 1.0M weekly downloads and Imagekit has approximately 28.4K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, cloudinary or imagekit?
- Cloudinary currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Cloudinary has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Imagekit scores 60/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.