Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Cloudinary vs Imagekit

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Imagekit

7.3 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Cloudinary

951.6K weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Cloudinary

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Cloudinary

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Cloudinary

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

cloudinary icon

cloudinary

Popular

Version 2.11.0

0
83
Excellent

Upload, transform, optimize, and manage images and videos with Cloudinary from Node.js.

Weekly Downloads
951.6K
↓10%
Bundle (gzip)
58.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
90
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
imagekit icon

imagekit

Moderate

Version 6.0.0

0
59
Fair

Offical NodeJS SDK for ImageKit.io integration

Weekly Downloads
46.0K
↑20%
Bundle (gzip)
7.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Cloudinary and Imagekit? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Cloudinary leads with 951.6K weekly downloads — roughly 20.7x more. Imagekit has 46.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Imagekit has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. Cloudinary comes in at 58.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Cloudinary has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Imagekit has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Cloudinary if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Imagekit if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Cloudinary and Imagekit are solid choices for JavaScript development. Cloudinary has the edge in overall health score (83/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is cloudinary better than imagekit?
It depends on your needs. Cloudinary has a health score of 83/100 while Imagekit scores 59/100. Cloudinary has more weekly downloads (951.6K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, cloudinary or imagekit?
Imagekit has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use cloudinary vs imagekit?
Based on npm download statistics, Cloudinary has approximately 951.6K weekly downloads and Imagekit has approximately 46.0K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, cloudinary or imagekit?
Cloudinary currently has the higher overall health score at 83/100. Cloudinary has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Imagekit scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Cloudinary vs Imgix

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.