Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 10.0.2
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
Version 12.1.3
Rome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
Choosing between Eslint and Rome? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Eslint leads with 100.8M weekly downloads — roughly 5994.3x more. Rome has 16.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Rome has the smallest gzipped bundle at 15.2 KB. Eslint comes in at 846.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Rome has an overall health score of 60/100 (good), with strong quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Rome if you value strong security track record.
Both Eslint and Rome are solid choices for JavaScript development. Eslint has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.