61
GoodStandards-compliant WebSocket server and client
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.4M
↓8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 15.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Faye-websocket vs Ws
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Ws
225.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Ws
222.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Ws
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Faye-websocket
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Ws
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentSimple to use, blazing fast and thoroughly tested websocket client and server for Node.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 222.5M
2%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 225.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Faye-websocket and Ws? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Ws leads with 222.5M weekly downloads — roughly 7.8x more. Faye-websocket has 28.4M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ws has the smallest gzipped bundle at 225.0 B. Faye-websocket comes in at 15.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Ws has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Faye-websocket has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Faye-websocket if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Ws if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Faye-websocket and Ws are solid choices for JavaScript development. Ws has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is faye-websocket better than ws?
- It depends on your needs. Faye-websocket has a health score of 61/100 while Ws scores 85/100. Ws has more weekly downloads (222.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, faye-websocket or ws?
- Ws has the smaller gzipped bundle at 225.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use faye-websocket vs ws?
- Based on npm download statistics, Faye-websocket has approximately 28.4M weekly downloads and Ws has approximately 222.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, faye-websocket or ws?
- Ws currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Faye-websocket has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Ws scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.