67
GoodMinimal GraphQL client supporting Node and browsers for scripts or simple apps.
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.7M
↓8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Graphql-request vs Urql
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Urql
2.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Graphql-request
9.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Urql
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Graphql-request
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Graphql-request
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentA highly customizable and versatile GraphQL client for React
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.1M
↓7%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Graphql-request and Urql? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Graphql-request leads with 9.7M weekly downloads — roughly 8.6x more. Urql has 1.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Urql has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.1 KB. Graphql-request comes in at 2.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Urql has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Graphql-request has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Graphql-request if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Urql if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Graphql-request and Urql are solid choices for JavaScript development. Urql has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is graphql-request better than urql?
- It depends on your needs. Graphql-request has a health score of 67/100 while Urql scores 85/100. Graphql-request has more weekly downloads (9.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, graphql-request or urql?
- Urql has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use graphql-request vs urql?
- Based on npm download statistics, Graphql-request has approximately 9.7M weekly downloads and Urql has approximately 1.1M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, graphql-request or urql?
- Urql currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Graphql-request has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Urql scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.