54
FairTypescript wrapper for the Hugging Face Inference API
- Weekly Downloads
- 919
↑227%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
30
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Huggingface vs Replicate
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Huggingface
1.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Replicate
434.8K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Replicate
60/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Huggingface
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Replicate
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
69
GoodJavaScript client for Replicate
- Weekly Downloads
- 434.8K
↑7%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 43.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Huggingface and Replicate? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Replicate leads with 434.8K weekly downloads — roughly 473.2x more. Huggingface has 919 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Huggingface has the smallest gzipped bundle at 1.2 KB. Replicate comes in at 43.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Replicate has an overall health score of 69/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Huggingface has an overall health score of 54/100 (moderate), with strong quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Huggingface if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Replicate if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Huggingface and Replicate are solid choices for JavaScript development. Replicate has the edge in overall health score (69/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is huggingface better than replicate?
- It depends on your needs. Huggingface has a health score of 54/100 while Replicate scores 69/100. Replicate has more weekly downloads (434.8K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, huggingface or replicate?
- Huggingface has the smaller gzipped bundle at 1.2 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use huggingface vs replicate?
- Based on npm download statistics, Huggingface has approximately 919 weekly downloads and Replicate has approximately 434.8K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, huggingface or replicate?
- Replicate currently has the higher overall health score at 69/100. Huggingface has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Replicate scores 60/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.