53
FairA wrapper around the imagemagick cli
- Weekly Downloads
- 34.8K
Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.9 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Imagemagick vs Sharp
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Imagemagick
2.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Sharp
62.4M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Sharp
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Imagemagick
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Sharp
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentHigh performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
- Weekly Downloads
- 62.4M
↓4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 34.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Imagemagick and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Sharp leads with 62.4M weekly downloads — roughly 1790.2x more. Imagemagick has 34.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Imagemagick has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.9 KB. Sharp comes in at 34.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Sharp has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Imagemagick if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Imagemagick and Sharp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Sharp has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is imagemagick better than sharp?
- It depends on your needs. Imagemagick has a health score of 53/100 while Sharp scores 85/100. Sharp has more weekly downloads (62.4M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, imagemagick or sharp?
- Imagemagick has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use imagemagick vs sharp?
- Based on npm download statistics, Imagemagick has approximately 34.8K weekly downloads and Sharp has approximately 62.4M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, imagemagick or sharp?
- Sharp currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Imagemagick has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Sharp scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.