imagemagick
Niche
Version 0.1.3
0
43
FairA wrapper around the imagemagick cli
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Imagemagick vs Sharp
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Most Popular
Imagemagick
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Sharp
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Imagemagick
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Imagemagick
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.34.5
0
67
GoodHigh performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 156.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Imagemagick and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Imagemagick and Sharp both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Bundle Size
Imagemagick has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Sharp comes in at 156.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Sharp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Imagemagick if you value strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Imagemagick and Sharp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Sharp has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is imagemagick better than sharp?
- It depends on your needs. Imagemagick has a health score of 43/100 while Sharp scores 67/100. Imagemagick has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, imagemagick or sharp?
- Imagemagick has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use imagemagick vs sharp?
- Based on npm download statistics, Imagemagick has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Sharp has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, imagemagick or sharp?
- Sharp currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Imagemagick has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Sharp scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.