Comparison guide
Imagemagick vs Sharp
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

- 0
sharp
High performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
Downloads unavailable · 34.3 KB gzip · Health 67/100
0
Choosing between Imagemagick and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Weekly download data is unavailable for Imagemagick. Weekly download data is unavailable for Sharp. Missing data is not zero downloads. We cannot compare download activity until all counts are available.
Bundle Size
Imagemagick has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.9 KB. Sharp comes in at 34.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Sharp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics. Download data is incomplete; these composite scores include a fallback popularity input and should not determine an overall winner.
When to Choose Each
Choose Imagemagick if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Download data is incomplete for this comparison of Imagemagick and Sharp. We are not selecting an overall winner from incomplete metrics. Compare the available bundle, maintenance, and quality information against your project's requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is imagemagick better than sharp?
- It depends on your needs. Imagemagick has a health score of 43/100 while Sharp scores 67/100. Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, imagemagick or sharp?
- Imagemagick has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use imagemagick vs sharp?
- Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, imagemagick or sharp?
- Sharp has a maintenance score of 100/100. Imagemagick scores 20/100 and Sharp scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.

