Skip to main content

Jimp vs Sharp

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Sharp

156.3 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Jimp

0 weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Jimp

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Jimp

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Sharp

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

jimp icon

jimp

Niche

Version 1.6.1

0
67
Good

An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
970.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
sharp icon

sharp

Niche

Version 0.34.5

0
67
Good

High performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
156.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Jimp and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Jimp and Sharp both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Sharp has the smallest gzipped bundle at 156.3 KB. Jimp comes in at 970.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Jimp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Sharp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Jimp if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Jimp and Sharp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jimp better than sharp?
It depends on your needs. Jimp has a health score of 67/100 while Sharp scores 67/100. Jimp has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, jimp or sharp?
Sharp has the smaller gzipped bundle at 156.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use jimp vs sharp?
Based on npm download statistics, Jimp has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Sharp has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, jimp or sharp?
Jimp currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Jimp has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Sharp scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Imagemagick vs Sharp

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.