79
GoodAn image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.0M
2%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 970.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Jimp vs Sharp
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Sharp
34.3 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Sharp
64.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Jimp
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Jimp
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Sharp
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
79
GoodHigh performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
- Weekly Downloads
- 64.7M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 34.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Jimp and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Sharp leads with 64.7M weekly downloads — roughly 16.2x more. Jimp has 4.0M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Sharp has the smallest gzipped bundle at 34.3 KB. Jimp comes in at 970.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Jimp has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Sharp has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Jimp if you value large community support, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Jimp and Sharp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is jimp better than sharp?
- It depends on your needs. Jimp has a health score of 79/100 while Sharp scores 79/100. Sharp has more weekly downloads (64.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, jimp or sharp?
- Sharp has the smaller gzipped bundle at 34.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use jimp vs sharp?
- Based on npm download statistics, Jimp has approximately 4.0M weekly downloads and Sharp has approximately 64.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, jimp or sharp?
- Jimp currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Jimp has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Sharp scores 80/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.