jimp
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
Downloads unavailable · 143.0 B gzip · Health 49/100
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
Downloads unavailable · 143.0 B gzip · Health 49/100
High performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
Downloads unavailable · 34.3 KB gzip · Health 67/100
Choosing between Jimp and Sharp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Weekly download data is unavailable for Jimp. Weekly download data is unavailable for Sharp. Missing data is not zero downloads. We cannot compare download activity until all counts are available.
Jimp has the smallest gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. Sharp comes in at 34.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Sharp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Jimp has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics. Download data is incomplete; these composite scores include a fallback popularity input and should not determine an overall winner.
Choose Jimp if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Download data is incomplete for this comparison of Jimp and Sharp. We are not selecting an overall winner from incomplete metrics. Compare the available bundle, maintenance, and quality information against your project's requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.