jsonwebtoken
JSON Web Token implementation (symmetric and asymmetric)
60.3M weekly downloads · 15.6 KB gzip · Health 73/100
0
Comparison guide
Jsonwebtoken vs Paseto
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Paseto
5.4 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Jsonwebtoken
60.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Paseto
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Jsonwebtoken
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Jsonwebtoken
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
paseto
PASETO and PASERK for Node.js, Browser, Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun, and other Web-interoperable runtimes
48.8K weekly downloads · 5.4 KB gzip · Health 71/100
0
Choosing between Jsonwebtoken and Paseto? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Jsonwebtoken leads with 60.3M weekly downloads — roughly 1236.9x more. Paseto has 48.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Paseto has the smallest gzipped bundle at 5.4 KB. Jsonwebtoken comes in at 15.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Jsonwebtoken has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Paseto has an overall health score of 71/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Jsonwebtoken if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Paseto if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Jsonwebtoken and Paseto are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jsonwebtoken has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is jsonwebtoken better than paseto?
- It depends on your needs. Jsonwebtoken has a health score of 73/100 while Paseto scores 71/100. Jsonwebtoken has more recorded weekly downloads (60.3M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
- Paseto has the smaller gzipped bundle at 5.4 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use jsonwebtoken vs paseto?
- Jsonwebtoken has more recorded weekly downloads (60.3M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
- Paseto has a maintenance score of 80/100. Jsonwebtoken scores 60/100 and Paseto scores 80/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.