Jsonwebtoken vs Paseto

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

jsonwebtoken

Extremely Popular

Version 9.0.3

79
Good

JSON Web Token implementation (symmetric and asymmetric)

Weekly Downloads
34.7M
↑33%
Bundle (gzip)
15.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

paseto

Moderate

Version 3.1.4

53
Fair

PASETO for Node.js with no dependencies

Weekly Downloads
34.4K
↑46%
Bundle (gzip)
15.8 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Jsonwebtoken and Paseto? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Jsonwebtoken leads with 34.7M weekly downloads — roughly 1008.5x more. Paseto has 34.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Jsonwebtoken has the smallest gzipped bundle at 15.6 KB. Paseto comes in at 15.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Jsonwebtoken has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Paseto has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Jsonwebtoken if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Paseto if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Jsonwebtoken and Paseto are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jsonwebtoken has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jsonwebtoken better than paseto?
It depends on your needs. Jsonwebtoken has a health score of 79/100 while Paseto scores 53/100. Jsonwebtoken has more weekly downloads (34.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
Jsonwebtoken has the smaller gzipped bundle at 15.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use jsonwebtoken vs paseto?
Based on npm download statistics, Jsonwebtoken has approximately 34.7M weekly downloads and Paseto has approximately 34.4K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
Jsonwebtoken currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Jsonwebtoken has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Paseto scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Jose vs Jsonwebtoken