langchain
Version 1.2.32
Typescript bindings for langchain
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.8M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.9 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 1.2.32
Typescript bindings for langchain
Version 1.3.12
cli for mastra
Choosing between Langchain and Mastra? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Langchain leads with 1.8M weekly downloads — roughly 9.9x more. Mastra has 181.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Langchain has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.9 KB. Mastra comes in at 5.2 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Mastra has an overall health score of 88/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Langchain has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Langchain if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Mastra if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Langchain and Mastra are solid choices for JavaScript development. Mastra has the edge in overall health score (88/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Get the latest package insights, npm trends, and tooling tips delivered to your inbox.