Version 4.18.1
0
85
ExcellentLodash modular utilities.
- Weekly Downloads
- 133.1M
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 414.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Lodash vs Ramda
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Ramda
352.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Lodash
133.1M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Lodash
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Lodash
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Lodash
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.32.0
0
67
GoodA practical functional library for JavaScript programmers.
- Weekly Downloads
- 12.8M
↓13%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 352.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Lodash and Ramda? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Lodash leads with 133.1M weekly downloads — roughly 10.4x more. Ramda has 12.8M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ramda has the smallest gzipped bundle at 352.1 KB. Lodash comes in at 414.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Lodash has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Ramda has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Lodash if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Ramda if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Lodash and Ramda are solid choices for JavaScript development. Lodash has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is lodash better than ramda?
- It depends on your needs. Lodash has a health score of 85/100 while Ramda scores 67/100. Lodash has more weekly downloads (133.1M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, lodash or ramda?
- Ramda has the smaller gzipped bundle at 352.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use lodash vs ramda?
- Based on npm download statistics, Lodash has approximately 133.1M weekly downloads and Ramda has approximately 12.8M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, lodash or ramda?
- Lodash currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Lodash has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Ramda scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.