Lodash vs Underscore

Downloads & Popularity

Lodash and Underscore both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Underscore has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. Lodash comes in at 24.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Lodash has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Underscore has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Lodash if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Underscore if you value strong security track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is lodash better than underscore?

It depends on your needs. Lodash has a health score of 67/100 while Underscore scores 49/100. Lodash has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.

Which has a smaller bundle size, lodash or underscore?

Underscore has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.

How many developers use lodash vs underscore?

Based on npm download statistics, Lodash has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Underscore has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.

Which is better maintained, lodash or underscore?

Lodash currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Lodash has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Underscore scores 40/100 on maintenance.