Skip to main content

@mantine/core vs Shadcn-ui

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Shadcn-ui

2.5 KB gzipped

Most Popular

@mantine/core

1.3M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

@mantine/core

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

@mantine/core

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

@mantine/core

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

@mantine/core icon

@mantine/core

Very Popular

Version 9.0.1

0
85
Excellent

React components library focused on usability, accessibility and developer experience

Weekly Downloads
1.3M
↓8%
Bundle (gzip)
127.7 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
shadcn-ui icon

shadcn-ui

Popular

Version 0.9.5

0
63
Good

Add components to your apps.

Weekly Downloads
127.6K
Stable
Bundle (gzip)
2.5 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @mantine/core and Shadcn-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@mantine/core leads with 1.3M weekly downloads — roughly 10.3x more. Shadcn-ui has 127.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Shadcn-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.5 KB. @mantine/core comes in at 127.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@mantine/core has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Shadcn-ui has an overall health score of 63/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @mantine/core if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Shadcn-ui if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @mantine/core and Shadcn-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mantine/core has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @mantine/core better than shadcn-ui?
It depends on your needs. @mantine/core has a health score of 85/100 while Shadcn-ui scores 63/100. @mantine/core has more weekly downloads (1.3M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @mantine/core or shadcn-ui?
Shadcn-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.5 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @mantine/core vs shadcn-ui?
Based on npm download statistics, @mantine/core has approximately 1.3M weekly downloads and Shadcn-ui has approximately 127.6K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @mantine/core or shadcn-ui?
@mantine/core currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @mantine/core has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Shadcn-ui scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Daisyui vs Shadcn-ui@mantine/core vs @mui/material

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.