@mantine/core
React components library focused on usability, accessibility and developer experience
2.8M weekly downloads · 170.3 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Comparison guide
@mantine/core vs @mui/material
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
@mui/material
152.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
@mui/material
10.2M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@mantine/core
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@mantine/core
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@mui/material
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
@mui/material
Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.
10.2M weekly downloads · 152.9 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between @mantine/core and @mui/material? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@mui/material leads with 10.2M weekly downloads — roughly 3.6x more. @mantine/core has 2.8M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 152.9 KB. @mantine/core comes in at 170.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@mantine/core has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. @mui/material has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @mantine/core if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose @mui/material if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @mantine/core and @mui/material are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mantine/core has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @mantine/core better than @mui/material?
- It depends on your needs. @mantine/core has a health score of 85/100 while @mui/material scores 85/100. @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (10.2M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @mantine/core or @mui/material?
- @mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 152.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @mantine/core vs @mui/material?
- @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (10.2M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @mantine/core or @mui/material?
- @mantine/core has a maintenance score of 100/100. @mantine/core scores 100/100 and @mui/material scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.