oxc
Version 1.0.1
Type `oxc` to Xcode with a workspace, project or file from the command line.
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.2K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 1.0.1
Type `oxc` to Xcode with a workspace, project or file from the command line.
Version 1.0.11
Alias for @swc/cli
Choosing between Oxc and Swc? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Swc leads with 13.6K weekly downloads — roughly 11.1x more. Oxc has 1.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Oxc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Swc comes in at 129.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Swc has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Oxc has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Oxc if you value strong security track record. Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Oxc and Swc are solid choices for JavaScript development. Swc has the edge in overall health score (59/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Get the latest package insights, npm trends, and tooling tips delivered to your inbox.