oxc
Type `oxc` to Xcode with a workspace, project or file from the command line.
645 weekly downloads · 0 B gzip · Health 47/100
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Most Popular
Swc
10.9K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Oxc
20/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Oxc
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Swc
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Type `oxc` to Xcode with a workspace, project or file from the command line.
645 weekly downloads · 0 B gzip · Health 47/100
Choosing between Oxc and Swc? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Swc leads with 10.9K weekly downloads — roughly 16.9x more. Oxc has 645 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Oxc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Swc comes in at 129.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Swc has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Oxc has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Oxc if you value strong security track record. Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Oxc and Swc are solid choices for JavaScript development. Swc has the edge in overall health score (53/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.