Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 12.1.1
Functional utility library - modern, simple, typed, powerful
Version 0.32.0
A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers.
Choosing between Radash and Ramda? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Ramda leads with 12.8M weekly downloads — roughly 12.1x more. Radash has 1.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Radash has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.6 KB. Ramda comes in at 14.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Ramda has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Radash has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Radash if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Ramda if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Both Radash and Ramda are solid choices for JavaScript development. Ramda has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.