Version 12.1.1
0
67
GoodFunctional utility library - modern, simple, typed, powerful
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.3M
↑3%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 4.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Radash vs Ramda
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Radash
4.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Ramda
13.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Radash
40/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Radash
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Ramda
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.32.0
0
67
GoodA practical functional library for JavaScript programmers.
- Weekly Downloads
- 13.3M
↓10%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 352.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Radash and Ramda? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Ramda leads with 13.3M weekly downloads — roughly 10.6x more. Radash has 1.3M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Radash has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.6 KB. Ramda comes in at 352.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Radash has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Ramda has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Radash if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Ramda if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Radash and Ramda are solid choices for JavaScript development. Radash has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is radash better than ramda?
- It depends on your needs. Radash has a health score of 67/100 while Ramda scores 67/100. Ramda has more weekly downloads (13.3M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, radash or ramda?
- Radash has the smaller gzipped bundle at 4.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use radash vs ramda?
- Based on npm download statistics, Radash has approximately 1.3M weekly downloads and Ramda has approximately 13.3M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, radash or ramda?
- Radash currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Radash has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Ramda scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.