Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Serverless vs Sst

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Sst

4.8 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Sst

709.3K weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Serverless

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Serverless

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Sst

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

  1. serverless

    [![Serverless Framework AWS Lambda AWS DynamoDB AWS API Gateway](https://github.com/serverless/serverless/assets/2752551/66a8c6a9-bc4a-4116-b139-90c12963337e)](https://serverless.com)

    661.2K weekly downloads · 12.1 KB gzip · Health 83/100

    0

  2. sst

    <p align="center"> <a href="https://sst.dev/"> <img alt="SST" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sst/identity/main/variants/sst-full.svg" width="300" /> </a> </p>

    709.3K weekly downloads · 4.8 KB gzip · Health 83/100

    0

Choosing between Serverless and Sst? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Sst leads with 709.3K weekly downloads — roughly 1.1x more. Serverless has 661.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Sst has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.8 KB. Serverless comes in at 12.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Serverless has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Sst has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Serverless if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Sst if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Serverless and Sst are solid choices for JavaScript development. Serverless has the edge in overall health score (83/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is serverless better than sst?
It depends on your needs. Serverless has a health score of 83/100 while Sst scores 83/100. Sst has more recorded weekly downloads (709.3K). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, serverless or sst?
Sst has the smaller gzipped bundle at 4.8 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use serverless vs sst?
Sst has more recorded weekly downloads (709.3K). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, serverless or sst?
Serverless has a maintenance score of 100/100. Serverless scores 100/100 and Sst scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Aws-cdk vs Serverless

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.