85
ExcellentHooks for managing, caching and syncing asynchronous and remote data in React
- Weekly Downloads
- 52.1M
↑45%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 13.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
@tanstack/react-query vs Apollo-client
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
@tanstack/react-query leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
57
FairA simple yet functional GraphQL client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 488.9K
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 15.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @tanstack/react-query and Apollo-client? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@tanstack/react-query leads with 52.1M weekly downloads — roughly 106.6x more. Apollo-client has 488.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@tanstack/react-query has the smallest gzipped bundle at 13.3 KB. Apollo-client comes in at 15.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@tanstack/react-query has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Apollo-client has an overall health score of 57/100 (moderate), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @tanstack/react-query if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Apollo-client if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @tanstack/react-query and Apollo-client are solid choices for JavaScript development. @tanstack/react-query has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @tanstack/react-query better than apollo-client?
- It depends on your needs. @tanstack/react-query has a health score of 85/100 while Apollo-client scores 57/100. @tanstack/react-query has more weekly downloads (52.1M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @tanstack/react-query or apollo-client?
- @tanstack/react-query has the smaller gzipped bundle at 13.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @tanstack/react-query vs apollo-client?
- Based on npm download statistics, @tanstack/react-query has approximately 52.1M weekly downloads and Apollo-client has approximately 488.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @tanstack/react-query or apollo-client?
- @tanstack/react-query currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @tanstack/react-query has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Apollo-client scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.