Swc vs Typescript

Downloads & Popularity

Typescript leads with 184.4M weekly downloads — roughly 16937.3x more. Swc has 10.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Swc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 129.0 B. Typescript comes in at 967.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Typescript has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Swc has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Typescript if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swc better than typescript?

It depends on your needs. Swc has a health score of 53/100 while Typescript scores 92/100. Typescript has more recorded weekly downloads (184.4M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.

Which has a smaller bundle size, swc or typescript?

Swc has the smaller gzipped bundle at 129.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.

How many developers use swc vs typescript?

Typescript has more recorded weekly downloads (184.4M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.

Which is better maintained, swc or typescript?

Typescript has a maintenance score of 100/100. Swc scores 20/100 and Typescript scores 100/100 on maintenance.