antd
An enterprise-class UI design language and React components implementation
2.1M weekly downloads · 445.2 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Comparison guide
Antd vs Material-ui
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Material-ui
99.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Antd
2.1M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Antd
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Antd
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Antd
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
material-ui
React Components that Implement Google's Material Design.
42.6K weekly downloads · 99.6 KB gzip · Health 53/100
0
Choosing between Antd and Material-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Antd leads with 2.1M weekly downloads — roughly 49.2x more. Material-ui has 42.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Material-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 99.6 KB. Antd comes in at 445.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Antd has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Material-ui has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Antd if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Material-ui if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Antd and Material-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. Antd has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is antd better than material-ui?
- It depends on your needs. Antd has a health score of 85/100 while Material-ui scores 53/100. Antd has more recorded weekly downloads (2.1M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, antd or material-ui?
- Material-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 99.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use antd vs material-ui?
- Antd has more recorded weekly downloads (2.1M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, antd or material-ui?
- Antd has a maintenance score of 100/100. Antd scores 100/100 and Material-ui scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.