85
ExcellentResponsive and accessible React UI components built with React and Emotion
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.3M
↓8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 282.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
@chakra-ui/react vs Antd
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
@chakra-ui/react
282.0 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Antd
3.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@chakra-ui/react
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@chakra-ui/react
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Antd
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentAn enterprise-class UI design language and React components implementation
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.5M
↓4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 434.5 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @chakra-ui/react and Antd? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Antd leads with 3.5M weekly downloads — roughly 2.6x more. @chakra-ui/react has 1.3M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@chakra-ui/react has the smallest gzipped bundle at 282.0 KB. Antd comes in at 434.5 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@chakra-ui/react has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Antd has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @chakra-ui/react if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Antd if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @chakra-ui/react and Antd are solid choices for JavaScript development. @chakra-ui/react has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @chakra-ui/react better than antd?
- It depends on your needs. @chakra-ui/react has a health score of 85/100 while Antd scores 85/100. Antd has more weekly downloads (3.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @chakra-ui/react or antd?
- @chakra-ui/react has the smaller gzipped bundle at 282.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @chakra-ui/react vs antd?
- Based on npm download statistics, @chakra-ui/react has approximately 1.3M weekly downloads and Antd has approximately 3.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @chakra-ui/react or antd?
- @chakra-ui/react currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @chakra-ui/react has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Antd scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.