Is @mui/material better than antd?

It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 61/100 while Antd scores 67/100. Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.

Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or antd?

@mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 151.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.

How many developers use @mui/material vs antd?

Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.

Which is better maintained, @mui/material or antd?

Antd has a maintenance score of 100/100. @mui/material scores 80/100 and Antd scores 100/100 on maintenance.

@mui/material vs Antd — NPM Package Comparison

Choosing between @mui/material and Antd? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Weekly download data is unavailable for @mui/material. Weekly download data is unavailable for Antd. Missing data is not zero downloads. We cannot compare download activity until all counts are available.

Bundle Size

@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 151.1 KB. Antd comes in at 445.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Antd has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. @mui/material has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics. Download data is incomplete; these composite scores include a fallback popularity input and should not determine an overall winner.

When to Choose Each

Choose @mui/material if you value strong security track record. Choose Antd if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Download data is incomplete for this comparison of @mui/material and Antd. We are not selecting an overall winner from incomplete metrics. Compare the available bundle, maintenance, and quality information against your project's requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @mui/material better than antd?: It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 61/100 while Antd scores 67/100. Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or antd?: @mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 151.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @mui/material vs antd?: Weekly download data is incomplete, so no popularity ranking is available. Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, @mui/material or antd?: Antd has a maintenance score of 100/100. @mui/material scores 80/100 and Antd scores 100/100 on maintenance.

@mui/material vs Antd

@mui/material

antd