@biomejs/biome
Biome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
10.9M weekly downloads · 229.1 KB gzip · Health 92/100
0
Comparison guide
@biomejs/biome vs Biomejs vs Eslint
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Biomejs
63.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Eslint
95.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@biomejs/biome
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@biomejs/biome
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Eslint
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
biomejs
70 weekly downloads · 63.0 B gzip · Health 49/100
0eslint
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
95.3M weekly downloads · 366.8 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Biomejs and Eslint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Eslint leads with 95.3M weekly downloads — roughly 8.8x more. @biomejs/biome has 10.9M weekly downloads. Biomejs has 70 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Biomejs has the smallest gzipped bundle at 63.0 B. @biomejs/biome comes in at 229.1 KB. Eslint comes in at 366.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Biomejs has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Biomejs if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Biomejs and Eslint are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than biomejs?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Biomejs scores 49/100. @biomejs/biome has more recorded weekly downloads (10.9M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or biomejs?
- Biomejs has the smaller gzipped bundle at 63.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs biomejs?
- @biomejs/biome has more recorded weekly downloads (10.9M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or biomejs?
- @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100. @biomejs/biome scores 100/100 and Biomejs scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.