Version 2.4.10
0
92
ExcellentBiome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
- Weekly Downloads
- 6.7M
↑30%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 195.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
@biomejs/biome vs Oxlint
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
@biomejs/biome leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
Version 1.58.0
0
92
ExcellentLinter for the JavaScript Oxidation Compiler
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.1M
↑110%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 408.9 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Oxlint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@biomejs/biome leads with 6.7M weekly downloads — roughly 1.6x more. Oxlint has 4.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@biomejs/biome has the smallest gzipped bundle at 195.7 KB. Oxlint comes in at 408.9 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Oxlint has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Oxlint if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Oxlint are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than oxlint?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Oxlint scores 92/100. @biomejs/biome has more weekly downloads (6.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or oxlint?
- @biomejs/biome has the smaller gzipped bundle at 195.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs oxlint?
- Based on npm download statistics, @biomejs/biome has approximately 6.7M weekly downloads and Oxlint has approximately 4.1M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or oxlint?
- @biomejs/biome currently has the higher overall health score at 92/100. @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Oxlint scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.