43
FairModern CSS framework based on Flexbox
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 76.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Bulma vs Tailwindcss
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Tailwindcss
69.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Bulma
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Tailwindcss
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Bulma
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Tailwindcss
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
67
GoodA utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 69.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Bulma and Tailwindcss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Bulma and Tailwindcss both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Bundle Size
Tailwindcss has the smallest gzipped bundle at 69.1 KB. Bulma comes in at 76.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Bulma has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Bulma if you value strong security track record. Choose Tailwindcss if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Bulma and Tailwindcss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is bulma better than tailwindcss?
- It depends on your needs. Bulma has a health score of 43/100 while Tailwindcss scores 67/100. Bulma has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, bulma or tailwindcss?
- Tailwindcss has the smaller gzipped bundle at 69.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use bulma vs tailwindcss?
- Based on npm download statistics, Bulma has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Tailwindcss has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, bulma or tailwindcss?
- Tailwindcss currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Bulma has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Tailwindcss scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.