bulma
Popular
Version 1.0.4
63
GoodModern CSS framework based on Flexbox
- Weekly Downloads
- 257.5K
↑32%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 76.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Bulma vs Tailwindcss
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
tailwindcss
Extremely Popular
Version 4.2.1
85
ExcellentA utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
- Weekly Downloads
- 60.7M
↑53%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 227.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Bulma and Tailwindcss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Tailwindcss leads with 60.7M weekly downloads — roughly 235.7x more. Bulma has 257.5K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Bulma has the smallest gzipped bundle at 76.0 KB. Tailwindcss comes in at 227.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Bulma has an overall health score of 63/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Bulma if you value strong security track record. Choose Tailwindcss if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Bulma and Tailwindcss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is bulma better than tailwindcss?
- It depends on your needs. Bulma has a health score of 63/100 while Tailwindcss scores 85/100. Tailwindcss has more weekly downloads (60.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, bulma or tailwindcss?
- Bulma has the smaller gzipped bundle at 76.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use bulma vs tailwindcss?
- Based on npm download statistics, Bulma has approximately 257.5K weekly downloads and Tailwindcss has approximately 60.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, bulma or tailwindcss?
- Tailwindcss currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Bulma has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Tailwindcss scores 100/100 on maintenance.