A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 69.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Tailwindcss leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Trend data unavailable
The instant on-demand Atomic CSS engine.
Trend data unavailable
Choosing between Tailwindcss and Unocss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Tailwindcss and Unocss both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Tailwindcss has the smallest gzipped bundle at 69.1 KB. Unocss comes in at 161.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Unocss has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Tailwindcss if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Unocss if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Tailwindcss and Unocss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.