Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 4.2.1
A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Version 66.6.2
The instant on-demand Atomic CSS engine.
Choosing between Tailwindcss and Unocss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Tailwindcss leads with 60.7M weekly downloads — roughly 184.4x more. Unocss has 329.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Unocss has the smallest gzipped bundle at 5.3 KB. Tailwindcss comes in at 227.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Unocss has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Tailwindcss if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Unocss if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Tailwindcss and Unocss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.