sass
Version 1.97.3
A pure JavaScript implementation of Sass.
- Weekly Downloads
- 24.1M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 675.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 1.97.3
A pure JavaScript implementation of Sass.
Version 4.2.1
A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Choosing between Sass and Tailwindcss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Tailwindcss leads with 60.7M weekly downloads — roughly 2.5x more. Sass has 24.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Tailwindcss has the smallest gzipped bundle at 227.1 KB. Sass comes in at 675.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Sass has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Sass if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Tailwindcss if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Sass and Tailwindcss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.