Skip to main content

Comparison guide

@chakra-ui/react vs @mui/material

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for @chakra-ui/react vs @mui/material

Quick Verdict

@chakra-ui/react leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

@chakra-ui/react icon

@chakra-ui/react

Niche

Version 3.36.1

0
67
Good

Responsive and accessible React UI components built with React and Emotion

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
780.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
@mui/material icon

@mui/material

Niche

Version 9.3.1

0
67
Good

Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
1.6 MB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @chakra-ui/react and @mui/material? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@chakra-ui/react and @mui/material both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

@chakra-ui/react has the smallest gzipped bundle at 780.3 KB. @mui/material comes in at 1.6 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@chakra-ui/react has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. @mui/material has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @chakra-ui/react if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose @mui/material if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @chakra-ui/react and @mui/material are solid choices for JavaScript development. @chakra-ui/react has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @chakra-ui/react better than @mui/material?
It depends on your needs. @chakra-ui/react has a health score of 67/100 while @mui/material scores 67/100. @chakra-ui/react has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @chakra-ui/react or @mui/material?
@chakra-ui/react has the smaller gzipped bundle at 780.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @chakra-ui/react vs @mui/material?
Based on npm download statistics, @chakra-ui/react has approximately 0 weekly downloads and @mui/material has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @chakra-ui/react or @mui/material?
@chakra-ui/react currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. @chakra-ui/react has a maintenance score of 100/100 and @mui/material scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

@mui/material vs Antd@mantine/core vs @mui/material@chakra-ui/react vs Antd

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.