@biomejs/biome
Biome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
17.9M weekly downloads · 229.1 KB gzip · Health 92/100
0
Comparison guide
@biomejs/biome vs Eslint
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
@biomejs/biome
229.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Eslint
158.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@biomejs/biome
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@biomejs/biome
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Eslint
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
eslint
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
158.7M weekly downloads · 366.8 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Eslint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Eslint leads with 158.7M weekly downloads — roughly 8.8x more. @biomejs/biome has 17.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@biomejs/biome has the smallest gzipped bundle at 229.1 KB. Eslint comes in at 366.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Eslint are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than eslint?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Eslint scores 85/100. Eslint has more recorded weekly downloads (158.7M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or eslint?
- @biomejs/biome has the smaller gzipped bundle at 229.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs eslint?
- Eslint has more recorded weekly downloads (158.7M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or eslint?
- @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100. @biomejs/biome scores 100/100 and Eslint scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.