Comparison guide
Imagemagick vs Jimp
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Jimp
143.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Jimp
4.1M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Jimp
40/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Imagemagick
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Jimp
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
- 0
jimp
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
4.1M weekly downloads · 143.0 B gzip · Health 67/100
0
Choosing between Imagemagick and Jimp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Jimp leads with 4.1M weekly downloads — roughly 90.2x more. Imagemagick has 45.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Jimp has the smallest gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. Imagemagick comes in at 2.9 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Jimp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Imagemagick if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Jimp if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Imagemagick and Jimp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is imagemagick better than jimp?
- It depends on your needs. Imagemagick has a health score of 53/100 while Jimp scores 67/100. Jimp has more recorded weekly downloads (4.1M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, imagemagick or jimp?
- Jimp has the smaller gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use imagemagick vs jimp?
- Jimp has more recorded weekly downloads (4.1M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, imagemagick or jimp?
- Jimp has a maintenance score of 40/100. Imagemagick scores 20/100 and Jimp scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.

