Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Imagemagick vs Jimp

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Jimp

143.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Jimp

4.1M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Jimp

40/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Imagemagick

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Jimp

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

  1. imagemagick

    A wrapper around the imagemagick cli

    45.6K weekly downloads · 2.9 KB gzip · Health 53/100

    0
  2. jimp

    An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.

    4.1M weekly downloads · 143.0 B gzip · Health 67/100

    0

Choosing between Imagemagick and Jimp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Jimp leads with 4.1M weekly downloads — roughly 90.2x more. Imagemagick has 45.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Jimp has the smallest gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. Imagemagick comes in at 2.9 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Jimp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Imagemagick if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Jimp if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Imagemagick and Jimp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is imagemagick better than jimp?
It depends on your needs. Imagemagick has a health score of 53/100 while Jimp scores 67/100. Jimp has more recorded weekly downloads (4.1M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, imagemagick or jimp?
Jimp has the smaller gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use imagemagick vs jimp?
Jimp has more recorded weekly downloads (4.1M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, imagemagick or jimp?
Jimp has a maintenance score of 40/100. Imagemagick scores 20/100 and Jimp scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.