imagemagick
Version 0.1.3
A wrapper around the imagemagick cli
- Weekly Downloads
- 32.2K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 0.1.3
A wrapper around the imagemagick cli
Version 1.6.0
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
Choosing between Imagemagick and Jimp? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Jimp leads with 2.1M weekly downloads — roughly 66.5x more. Imagemagick has 32.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Imagemagick has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Jimp comes in at 204.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Jimp has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Imagemagick has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Imagemagick if you value strong security track record. Choose Jimp if you value large community support, strong security track record.
Both Imagemagick and Jimp are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (61/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.