jimp
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
1.9M weekly downloads · 143.0 B gzip · Health 67/100
0
Comparison guide
Jimp vs Sharp vs Squoosh
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Squoosh
22.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Sharp
71.4M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Sharp
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Jimp
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Sharp
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
sharp
High performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
71.4M weekly downloads · 34.3 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0squoosh
13 weekly downloads · 22.0 B gzip · Health 43/100
0
Choosing between Jimp and Sharp and Squoosh? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Sharp leads with 71.4M weekly downloads — roughly 37.4x more. Jimp has 1.9M weekly downloads. Squoosh has 13 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Squoosh has the smallest gzipped bundle at 22.0 B. Jimp comes in at 143.0 B. Sharp comes in at 34.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Sharp has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Jimp has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Squoosh has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Jimp if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Squoosh if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Jimp and Sharp and Squoosh are solid choices for JavaScript development. Sharp has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is jimp better than sharp?
- It depends on your needs. Jimp has a health score of 67/100 while Sharp scores 85/100. Sharp has more recorded weekly downloads (71.4M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, jimp or sharp?
- Jimp has the smaller gzipped bundle at 143.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use jimp vs sharp?
- Sharp has more recorded weekly downloads (71.4M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, jimp or sharp?
- Sharp has a maintenance score of 100/100. Jimp scores 40/100 and Sharp scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.