Version 1.6.1
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.9M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 143.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Smallest Bundle
Squoosh
22.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Sharp
54.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Jimp
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Jimp
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Sharp
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 1.6.1
An image processing library written entirely in JavaScript.
Version 0.34.5
High performance Node.js image processing, the fastest module to resize JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIF and TIFF images
Version 0.0.0
Choosing between Jimp and Sharp and Squoosh? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Sharp leads with 54.7M weekly downloads — roughly 14.2x more. Jimp has 3.9M weekly downloads. Squoosh has 170 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Squoosh has the smallest gzipped bundle at 22.0 B. Jimp comes in at 143.0 B. Sharp comes in at 156.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Jimp has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Sharp has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Squoosh has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Jimp if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Sharp if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Squoosh if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Jimp and Sharp and Squoosh are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jimp has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.