css-modules
380 weekly downloads · 195.0 B gzip · Health 45/100
0
Comparison guide
Css-modules vs Tailwindcss
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Css-modules
195.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Tailwindcss
137.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Tailwindcss
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Css-modules
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Tailwindcss
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
tailwindcss
A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
137.3M weekly downloads · 69.1 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between Css-modules and Tailwindcss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Tailwindcss leads with 137.3M weekly downloads — roughly 361262.6x more. Css-modules has 380 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Css-modules has the smallest gzipped bundle at 195.0 B. Tailwindcss comes in at 69.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Tailwindcss has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Css-modules has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Css-modules if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Tailwindcss if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Css-modules and Tailwindcss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Tailwindcss has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is css-modules better than tailwindcss?
- It depends on your needs. Css-modules has a health score of 45/100 while Tailwindcss scores 85/100. Tailwindcss has more recorded weekly downloads (137.3M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, css-modules or tailwindcss?
- Css-modules has the smaller gzipped bundle at 195.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use css-modules vs tailwindcss?
- Tailwindcss has more recorded weekly downloads (137.3M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, css-modules or tailwindcss?
- Tailwindcss has a maintenance score of 100/100. Css-modules scores 20/100 and Tailwindcss scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.