Skip to main content

@mantine/core vs @mui/material vs Core vs Material

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

@mui/material

136.0 KB gzipped

Most Popular

@mui/material

8.5M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

@mantine/core

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

@mantine/core

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

@mui/material

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

@mantine/core icon

@mantine/core

Very Popular

Version 9.0.2

0
85
Excellent

React components library focused on usability, accessibility and developer experience

Weekly Downloads
1.4M
↓10%
Bundle (gzip)
2.1 MB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
@mui/material icon

@mui/material

Very Popular

Version 9.0.0

0
85
Excellent

Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.

Weekly Downloads
8.5M
↓8%
Bundle (gzip)
136.0 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

core

Niche

Version 1.0.113

0
49
Fair

Core Libs

Weekly Downloads
1.2K
↓21%
Bundle (gzip)
163.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
material icon

material

Niche

Version 1.0.3

0
67
Good

A lightweight implementation of Material Design Components for the web - ES6

Weekly Downloads
4.0K
2%Stable
Bundle (gzip)
166.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @mantine/core and @mui/material and Core and Material? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@mui/material leads with 8.5M weekly downloads — roughly 6.1x more. @mantine/core has 1.4M weekly downloads. Material has 4.0K weekly downloads. Core has 1.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. Core comes in at 163.1 KB. Material comes in at 166.6 KB. @mantine/core comes in at 2.1 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@mantine/core has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. @mui/material has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Material has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Core has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @mantine/core if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose @mui/material if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Core if you value strong security track record. Choose Material if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @mantine/core and @mui/material and Core and Material are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mantine/core has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @mantine/core better than @mui/material?
It depends on your needs. @mantine/core has a health score of 85/100 while @mui/material scores 85/100. @mui/material has more weekly downloads (8.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @mantine/core or @mui/material?
@mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @mantine/core vs @mui/material?
Based on npm download statistics, @mantine/core has approximately 1.4M weekly downloads and @mui/material has approximately 8.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @mantine/core or @mui/material?
@mantine/core currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @mantine/core has a maintenance score of 100/100 and @mui/material scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

@mui/material vs Antd@chakra-ui/react vs @mui/material@mantine/core vs @mui/material

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.