@mui/material
Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.
12.5M weekly downloads · 151.1 KB gzip · Health 79/100
0
Comparison guide
@mui/material vs React-bootstrap
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
React-bootstrap
37.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
@mui/material
12.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@mui/material
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@mui/material
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@mui/material
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
react-bootstrap
Bootstrap 5 components built with React
1.6M weekly downloads · 37.6 KB gzip · Health 61/100
0
Choosing between @mui/material and React-bootstrap? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@mui/material leads with 12.5M weekly downloads — roughly 7.7x more. React-bootstrap has 1.6M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
React-bootstrap has the smallest gzipped bundle at 37.6 KB. @mui/material comes in at 151.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@mui/material has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. React-bootstrap has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @mui/material if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose React-bootstrap if you value large community support, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @mui/material and React-bootstrap are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mui/material has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @mui/material better than react-bootstrap?
- It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 79/100 while React-bootstrap scores 61/100. @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (12.5M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or react-bootstrap?
- React-bootstrap has the smaller gzipped bundle at 37.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @mui/material vs react-bootstrap?
- @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (12.5M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @mui/material or react-bootstrap?
- @mui/material has a maintenance score of 80/100. @mui/material scores 80/100 and React-bootstrap scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.