Skip to main content

@mui/material vs React-bootstrap

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

@mui/material leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

@mui/material icon

@mui/material

Very Popular

Version 9.0.0

0
85
Excellent

Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.

Weekly Downloads
8.2M
↓8%
Bundle (gzip)
136.0 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
react-bootstrap icon

react-bootstrap

Very Popular

Version 2.10.10

0
67
Good

Bootstrap 5 components built with React

Weekly Downloads
1.5M
↓4%
Bundle (gzip)
433.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @mui/material and React-bootstrap? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@mui/material leads with 8.2M weekly downloads — roughly 5.3x more. React-bootstrap has 1.5M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. React-bootstrap comes in at 433.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@mui/material has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. React-bootstrap has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @mui/material if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose React-bootstrap if you value large community support, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @mui/material and React-bootstrap are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mui/material has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @mui/material better than react-bootstrap?
It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 85/100 while React-bootstrap scores 67/100. @mui/material has more weekly downloads (8.2M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or react-bootstrap?
@mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @mui/material vs react-bootstrap?
Based on npm download statistics, @mui/material has approximately 8.2M weekly downloads and React-bootstrap has approximately 1.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @mui/material or react-bootstrap?
@mui/material currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @mui/material has a maintenance score of 100/100 and React-bootstrap scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

@mui/material vs Antd@chakra-ui/react vs @mui/material@mantine/core vs @mui/material

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.