@mui/material
Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.
5.5M weekly downloads · 152.9 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Comparison guide
@mui/material vs Antd vs Material
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
@mui/material
152.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
@mui/material
5.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@mui/material
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Material
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@mui/material
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
antd
An enterprise-class UI design language and React components implementation
2.1M weekly downloads · 445.2 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0material
Material Design 3 components for the web: plain JavaScript, web components, and React, Vue, Svelte and Solid components. TypeScript, zero dependencies.
6.1K weekly downloads · 1.8 MB gzip · Health 82/100
0
Choosing between @mui/material and Antd and Material? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@mui/material leads with 5.5M weekly downloads — roughly 2.6x more. Antd has 2.1M weekly downloads. Material has 6.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 152.9 KB. Antd comes in at 445.2 KB. Material comes in at 1.8 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@mui/material has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Antd has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Material has an overall health score of 82/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @mui/material if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Antd if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Material if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @mui/material and Antd and Material are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mui/material has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @mui/material better than antd?
- It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 85/100 while Antd scores 85/100. @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (5.5M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or antd?
- @mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 152.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @mui/material vs antd?
- @mui/material has more recorded weekly downloads (5.5M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @mui/material or antd?
- @mui/material has a maintenance score of 100/100. @mui/material scores 100/100 and Antd scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.