Skip to main content

@mui/material vs Antd vs Material

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

@mui/material leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

@mui/material icon

@mui/material

Very Popular

Version 9.0.0

0
85
Excellent

Material UI is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design. It's comprehensive and can be used in production out of the box.

Weekly Downloads
8.2M
8%
Bundle (gzip)
136.0 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
antd icon

antd

Very Popular

Version 6.3.5

0
85
Excellent

An enterprise-class UI design language and React components implementation

Weekly Downloads
2.9M
8%
Bundle (gzip)
14.0 MB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Version 1.0.3

0
67
Good

A lightweight implementation of Material Design Components for the web - ES6

Weekly Downloads
4.0K
1%Stable
Bundle (gzip)
166.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @mui/material and Antd and Material? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@mui/material leads with 8.2M weekly downloads — roughly 2.8x more. Antd has 2.9M weekly downloads. Material has 4.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

@mui/material has the smallest gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. Material comes in at 166.6 KB. Antd comes in at 14.0 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@mui/material has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Antd has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Material has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @mui/material if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Antd if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Material if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @mui/material and Antd and Material are solid choices for JavaScript development. @mui/material has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @mui/material better than antd?
It depends on your needs. @mui/material has a health score of 85/100 while Antd scores 85/100. @mui/material has more weekly downloads (8.2M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @mui/material or antd?
@mui/material has the smaller gzipped bundle at 136.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @mui/material vs antd?
Based on npm download statistics, @mui/material has approximately 8.2M weekly downloads and Antd has approximately 2.9M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @mui/material or antd?
@mui/material currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @mui/material has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Antd scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.